Letter to Prof. Christopher Kutz, Chair, Berkeley Division, Academic Senate
Dear Prof. Kutz,
We, the undersigned UC Berkeley geography graduate students, wish to express our dismay at the “Open letter from the Academic Council to the University of California community,” dated November 30, 2009 (PDF). We assume that there will continue to be disagreements between the Council and many of us students about what constitutes a “necessary policy” in response to the state’s budget, especially given that we are noticing a pattern of privatization of the education system and tuition increases that predate this current crisis. We expect you to do better than only to blame the “state’s abrupt disinvestment” and hold the university administration accountable. However, the purpose of this missive is to bring up a more pressing concern.
The message in the Council’s letter that condemns building occupations, while perhaps expected and reasonable, misses a larger source of communal worry. As geographers, we are forced to ask ‘where?’: If peaceful protesters outside of Wheeler Hall in an open space are met with violence and barricades, where else is it that their concerns will be voiced? If deserving undergraduates face displacement out of the academy by economic sanction, where would you expect them to best confront this situation? If the administration is able to unilaterally shut Sproul and California Halls at Berkeley on the day of the anniversary of Mario Savio’s speech, where is it that the collective community can find that so-called “democratic access” that the Council’s letter mentions?
In other words, while one may (or may not) recoil at the immediate strategy of occupation, it highlights a larger problem not only of shrinking budgets, but of shrinking spaces to protest or otherwise exercise one’s rights. The police should not only be subject to a subdued and sedate “inquiry and review.” Perhaps the Council should consider that the use of police force, and even intimidation without direct force, are geared to entirely close our campuses to protest and divert attention out to Sacramento, which seems to be the hope of the Council and the administration. The Council’s letter states otherwise, but we find it hard to believe that a slap on the wrist of the police forces will keep our campuses “safe” for protests and free speech. In fact, the Council’s letter makes no mention of the presence of outside police and SWAT teams, and it remains unclear how the university is even able to inquire and review those, let alone assure us that those forces, which shouldn’t even be on campuses, will remain non-violent in the face of a peaceful protest.
We trust that the Academic Council will review these positions at its upcoming December 10, meeting.
Sincerely,
Glenna Anton, Javier Arbona, Teo Ballvé, Rachel Brahinsky, Jennifer Casolo, Erin Collins, Lindsey Dillon, Sapna Elizabeth Gardner Thottathil, Daniel Graham, Jenny Greenburg, Leigh Johnson, Julie Klinger, Miri Lavi-Neeman, Greta Marchesi, Nathan McClintock, Laura-Anne Minkoff-Zern, Diana Negrín da Silva, Raj Shekhar Singh, John Garrard Stehlin, Alex Tarr, Max Woodworth